Michigan Criminal Code: Criminal Enterprises

Discuss your case with an Attorney at no cost

Order of criminal forfeiture; notice; hearing to determine validity of claim of property interest; petition; consolidation of hearings; testimony and evidence; amendment of order

Published: 9 months ago

THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT) Act 328 of 1931

750.159k Order of criminal forfeiture; notice; hearing to determine validity of claim of property interest; petition; consolidation of hearings; testimony and evidence; amendment of order. Sec. 159k.

(1) Upon the entry of the order of criminal forfeiture pursuant to section 159j, the court shall cause notice of the order to be sent by certified mail to all persons known to have, or appearing to have, an interest in the property to be forfeited. To assist the court in determining whom to notify, the prosecuting agency shall conduct a search of county, state, and federal public records where notice of liens and security interests are normally recorded. If the name and address of the person are not reasonably ascertainable or delivery of the notice cannot reasonably be accomplished, the notice shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the prosecution occurred for 10 successive publishing days. Proof of written notice or publication shall be filed with the court entering the order of criminal forfeiture. (2) Within 21 days after receipt of the notice or after the date of the completion of the publication under subsection (1), a person, other than the defendant, who claims an interest in the property subject to criminal forfeiture may petition the court for a hearing to determine the validity of the claim. The petition shall be signed and sworn to by the petitioner and shall set forth the nature and extent of the petitioner's interest in the property, the date and circumstances of the petitioner's acquisition of the interest, any additional allegations supporting the claim, and the relief sought. The petitioner shall furnish the prosecuting agency with a copy of the petition. (3) To the extent practicable and consistent with the interests of justice, the court shall hold the hearing within 28 days after the filing of the petition. The court may consolidate the hearings on all petitions filed by third party claimants under this section. At the hearing, the petitioner may testify and present evidence on his or her own behalf and may cross-examine witnesses. The prosecuting agency may present evidence and witnesses in rebuttal and in defense of the claim of the state to the property and may cross-examine witnesses. The court, in making its determination, shall consider the testimony and evidence presented at the hearing and the relevant portions of the record of the criminal proceeding that resulted in the order of criminal forfeiture. (4) If the court determines 1 or more of the following, by a preponderance of the evidence, the court shall amend the order of criminal forfeiture in accordance with its determination to protect the rights of innocent persons: (a) The petitioner has a legal right, title, or interest in the property that, at the time of the commission of the acts giving rise to the forfeiture of the property, was vested in the petitioner and not in the defendant or was superior to the right, title, or interest of the defendant, and the petitioner did not have prior actual knowledge of the racketeering activity. (b) The petitioner is a bona fide purchaser for value of the right, title, or interest in the property and was at the time of the purchase reasonably without cause to believe that the property was subject to forfeiture under section 159j. (c) The property is encumbered by a security interest and the holder of the security interest did not have prior actual knowledge of the racketeering activity. (d) The property is encumbered by an unpaid balance on a land contract and the land contract vendor did not have prior actual knowledge of the racketeering activity.

History: Add. 1995, Act 187, Eff. Apr. 1, 1996

Simplified Explanation of Michigan Penal Code Section 750.159k

This section of the Michigan Penal Code outlines the process for giving notice and holding hearings after a court order for criminal forfeiture, usually concerning a case of racketeering.

  1. Notice of Forfeiture Order: Once an order of criminal forfeiture has been issued (as per Section 159j), the court will notify all individuals who are known to or appear to have an interest in the property that will be forfeited. This is done via certified mail. To determine who to notify, the prosecuting agency searches public records for liens and security interests. If the person cannot be located or reached, notice is published in a local newspaper for 10 days. The proof of written notice or publication is filed with the court.
  2. Petition for Hearing: A person, other than the defendant, claiming interest in the forfeited property can petition the court for a hearing to validate their claim within 21 days of receiving the notice or after the completion of the publication. This petition, which must be signed, sworn to, and furnished to the prosecuting agency, should describe the petitioner's interest in the property, how and when they acquired it, any supporting allegations, and the relief sought.
  3. Hearing Procedures: The court should ideally hold the hearing within 28 days after the petition is filed and may combine hearings on all petitions filed by third-party claimants. During the hearing, the petitioner can testify, present evidence, and cross-examine witnesses. The prosecuting agency can present evidence and witnesses in rebuttal and in defense of the state's claim to the property, and also cross-examine witnesses. The court will make its determination based on the testimony and evidence presented at the hearing and relevant parts of the criminal proceeding record.
  4. Amendment of Forfeiture Order: If the court determines, based on the preponderance of the evidence, that the petitioner has a legal right or interest in the property, that they were a bona fide purchaser without cause to believe the property was subject to forfeiture, or that the property is encumbered by a security interest or an unpaid balance on a land contract without the holder/vendor having prior knowledge of the racketeering activity, the court will amend the forfeiture order to protect the rights of these innocent persons.

Remember, this is a general explanation and not legal advice. Always consult with a legal professional for matters related to law.

This should be used for informational and general purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or relied on aside for general information that may contain opinion.


Contact Us About Your Case

From Our Clients


Randy Babi was absolutely phenomenal! One of the best attorneys out there. Doesn't tell you what you want to hear, but tells you the truth and keeps it real. On top of that, he gets the job done and gives you the best advice and will go full in on it. If your a review kind of person make sure you take this comment very seriously and give them a call immediately and don't waste any time.

- Twanzell W.

When this guy says he's a BOSS Attorney he really means it, he got a case dismissed for me when another reputable attorney told me I was getting two points no matter what. Randy went in the prosecuting attorneys office like a boss and came out with a dismissal, Thanks for living up to your name. This man is a LIVING LEGEND!

- Andre B.

Randy is great and easy to work with! He makes sure you feel valued and he is always on top of his game! Very appreciative of his hard work, professionalism, and knowledge! Thank you!

- Lamar B.

Mr. Babi just finished a case for my fiancé and we couldn't be more satisfied with the work he did! He fights for his clients, and puts in the work. Whenever my fiancé would be on the phone with him, I thought he was speaking to one of his friends. Very down to earth and gets the job done! I would highly recommend!

- Kelli C.

Randy Babi was my first and only call when looking for an Attorney. The reviews of his past cases is spot on 100%. His knowledge and experience is what makes him an amazing Attorney. He fought for me and I know he will fight for you! Please take my word and call these great people if you are in need, they will not let you down!

- Mike Z.

All I can say is attorney Carly the Boss represented me very well I always had contact with her. Her communication was excellent. I would recommend her Law Firm to anyone that has an issue the day I had court she spoke on my behalf she is very well spoken very professional and really has a passion for what she's doing so for me five stars 100% excellent service.

- Darryl R.

I am a family law attorney (and do not handles the same types of matters as Randy), but I know Randy well enough to make this recommendation. I endorse Attorney Randy Babi without hesitation. He knows the law, he cares for his clients, and is very trustworthy. God forbid I ever need his services, but he is one of the first people I would contact if I was in trouble.

- D. G.

5 years ago Great experience with Randy, the best attorney around, very kind and caring. He is the best at what he does and i highly recommend him to anyone. Very trustworthy and gets you the best possible outcomes. 5 stars all day long

- Calvin T.

Let's Work Together