Michigan Criminal Code: Criminal Enterprises

Discuss your case with an Attorney at no cost

Seizure of property subject to civil in rem forfeiture

Published: 9 months ago

THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT) Act 328 of 1931

750.159n Seizure of property subject to civil in rem forfeiture; petition; filing; personal or intangible property; determination by court; seizure without process; circumstances; lien notice against real property; notice and hearing required; return of property to crime victim; exceptions; custody of property by seizing agency. Sec. 159n.

(1) A civil in rem forfeiture proceeding under this chapter is a proceeding against property subject to forfeiture under section 159m instituted by the filing of a petition by the prosecuting agency. (2) Personal or intangible property subject to civil in rem forfeiture under section 159m may be seized pursuant to an order of seizure issued by the court having jurisdiction over the property. (3) Upon an ex parte application by the prosecuting agency, before or after the initiation of a civil in rem forfeiture proceeding, the court may determine ex parte whether there is probable cause to believe that personal or intangible property is subject to civil in rem forfeiture under section 159m and that notice to those persons having or claiming an interest in the property before seizure would cause the loss or destruction of the property. In making this determination, the court shall, as a matter of law, make a determination that the property constituted an interest in, means of control over, or influence over an enterprise involved in a violation of section 159i. If the court finds that probable cause does not exist to believe the property is subject to forfeiture under this act, the court shall dismiss the plaintiff prosecuting agency's application and, if a civil in rem forfeiture proceeding has been initiated, shall dismiss the petition. If the court finds that probable cause does exist to believe the property is subject to forfeiture but there is not probable cause to believe that prior notice would result in loss or destruction of the property, the court shall order service on all persons known to have or claim an interest in the property before a further hearing on whether an order of seizure should issue. If the court finds that there is probable cause to believe that the property is subject to forfeiture and to believe that prior notice would cause loss or destruction of the property, the court shall issue an order of seizure directing the sheriff or other law enforcement officer in the county where the property is found to seize it. (4) Personal or intangible property subject to civil in rem forfeiture under this chapter may be seized without process under any of the following circumstances: (a) The seizure is incident to a lawful arrest. (b) The seizure is pursuant to a valid search warrant. (c) The seizure is pursuant to an inspection under a valid administrative inspection warrant. (d) There is probable cause to believe that the property is directly or indirectly dangerous to health or safety. (e) Exigent circumstances exist that preclude the obtaining of a court order, and there is probable cause to believe that the property is subject to civil in rem forfeiture under section 159m. (f) The property is the subject of a prior judgment in favor of this state in a forfeiture proceeding. (5) The prosecuting agency may apply ex parte for an order authorizing the filing of a lien notice against real property subject to civil in rem forfeiture under section 159m. The application shall be supported by a sworn affidavit setting forth probable cause for a civil in rem forfeiture action pursuant to sections 159m to 159q. An order authorizing the filing of a lien notice may be issued upon a showing of probable cause to believe that the property is subject to civil in rem forfeiture under section 159m. (6) Real property shall not be seized without notice and a hearing. (7) Property that belongs to the victim of a crime shall promptly be returned to the victim, except in the following circumstances: (a) The property is contraband. (b) If the ownership of the property is disputed, until the dispute is resolved. (c) The property is required to be retained as evidence pursuant to section 4(4) of the crime victim's rights act, Act No. 87 of the Public Acts of 1985, being section 780.754 of the Michigan Compiled Laws. (8) Personal or intangible property seized under this section is not subject to any other action to recover personal property, but is considered to be in the custody of the seizing agency subject only to this chapter, or to an order and judgment of the court having jurisdiction over the civil in rem forfeiture proceedings. When property is seized under this section, the seizing agency may do 1 or more of the following: (a) Place the property under seal. (b) Remove the property to a place designated by the court.

History: Add. 1995, Act 187, Eff. Apr. 1, 1996

Simplified Explanation of Michigan Penal Code Section 750.159n

This part of the Michigan Penal Code deals with the seizure of property subject to civil forfeiture because of involvement in racketeering activity.

  1. Initiating Civil Forfeiture Proceedings: Civil forfeiture proceedings can be started by the prosecuting agency filing a petition against property that can be seized under section 159m.
  2. Seizure Order: Personal or intangible property that can be seized under section 159m may be taken under an order of seizure issued by the court with jurisdiction over the property.
  3. Ex Parte Application and Probable Cause: The prosecuting agency can make an ex parte application (an application made without notifying other parties involved) to the court, which can then decide if there's probable cause to believe that personal or intangible property can be seized under section 159m, and that notifying interested parties before seizure would lead to the loss or destruction of the property.
  4. Seizure Without a Court Order: Personal or intangible property may be seized without a court order under certain conditions, including during a lawful arrest, with a valid search warrant, during a valid administrative inspection, when the property poses a risk to health or safety, under exigent circumstances, or if the property is the subject of a previous forfeiture judgment.
  5. Lien Against Real Property: The prosecuting agency can apply for an order to file a lien notice against real property that can be seized under section 159m.
  6. Real Property Seizure Rules: Real property cannot be seized without giving notice and a hearing.
  7. Returning Property to Crime Victims: Property that belongs to a crime victim should be promptly returned to the victim, unless the property is contraband, its ownership is disputed, or it needs to be retained as evidence.
  8. Custody of Seized Property: Personal or intangible property seized under this section is considered to be in the custody of the agency that seized it, and it may be placed under seal or moved to a location designated by the court.

Please note, this explanation is a simplified summary of the law and not legal advice. Always consult a legal professional for matters related to law.

This should be used for informational and general purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or relied on aside for general information that may contain opinion.


Contact Us About Your Case

From Our Clients


Randy Babi was absolutely phenomenal! One of the best attorneys out there. Doesn't tell you what you want to hear, but tells you the truth and keeps it real. On top of that, he gets the job done and gives you the best advice and will go full in on it. If your a review kind of person make sure you take this comment very seriously and give them a call immediately and don't waste any time.

- Twanzell W.

When this guy says he's a BOSS Attorney he really means it, he got a case dismissed for me when another reputable attorney told me I was getting two points no matter what. Randy went in the prosecuting attorneys office like a boss and came out with a dismissal, Thanks for living up to your name. This man is a LIVING LEGEND!

- Andre B.

Randy is great and easy to work with! He makes sure you feel valued and he is always on top of his game! Very appreciative of his hard work, professionalism, and knowledge! Thank you!

- Lamar B.

Mr. Babi just finished a case for my fiancé and we couldn't be more satisfied with the work he did! He fights for his clients, and puts in the work. Whenever my fiancé would be on the phone with him, I thought he was speaking to one of his friends. Very down to earth and gets the job done! I would highly recommend!

- Kelli C.

Randy Babi was my first and only call when looking for an Attorney. The reviews of his past cases is spot on 100%. His knowledge and experience is what makes him an amazing Attorney. He fought for me and I know he will fight for you! Please take my word and call these great people if you are in need, they will not let you down!

- Mike Z.

All I can say is attorney Carly the Boss represented me very well I always had contact with her. Her communication was excellent. I would recommend her Law Firm to anyone that has an issue the day I had court she spoke on my behalf she is very well spoken very professional and really has a passion for what she's doing so for me five stars 100% excellent service.

- Darryl R.

I am a family law attorney (and do not handles the same types of matters as Randy), but I know Randy well enough to make this recommendation. I endorse Attorney Randy Babi without hesitation. He knows the law, he cares for his clients, and is very trustworthy. God forbid I ever need his services, but he is one of the first people I would contact if I was in trouble.

- D. G.

5 years ago Great experience with Randy, the best attorney around, very kind and caring. He is the best at what he does and i highly recommend him to anyone. Very trustworthy and gets you the best possible outcomes. 5 stars all day long

- Calvin T.

Let's Work Together