Michigan Criminal Code: Forgery and Counterfeiting

Discuss your case with an Attorney at no cost

Uttering or publishing as true document listed in MCL 750.248b; intent; felony

Published: 9 months ago

THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT) Act 328 of 1931

750.249b Uttering or publishing as true document listed in MCL 750.248b; intent; felony; penalty; exception; court order. Sec. 249b.

(1) A person who utters and publishes as true a false, forged, altered, or counterfeit deed or other document listed in section 248b knowing it to be false, forged, altered, or counterfeit with intent to injure or defraud is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 14 years. (2) This section does not apply to a scrivener's error. (3) In proceedings that result in a conviction under this section or for any lesser included offense, the circuit court shall enter an order stating that the false, forged, altered, or counterfeit document is invalid and requiring that a copy of the invalid document and a certified copy of the order be recorded in the office of the register of deeds of the county where the subject property or part of the property is located, as provided in section 2935 of the revised judicature act of 1961, 1961 PA 236, MCL 600.2935. If the invalid document has previously been recorded, the prosecutor shall provide the circuit court with the liber and page number or unique identifying reference number of the invalid document, which shall be included in the order. The register of deeds shall make reference to the liber and page number or unique identifying reference number of the invalid document in the index of the recorded documents. Any recording fees incurred under this subsection shall be paid as ordered by the court.

History: Add. 2011, Act 206, Eff. Jan. 1, 2012

Analysis of Michigan Penal Code Section 249b

The provided excerpt is from Act 328 of 1931, which includes Section 249b of the Michigan Penal Code. This section addresses the offense of uttering or publishing a false, forged, altered, or counterfeit deed or other document listed in section 248b. The following analysis provides an overview of the key elements and implications of this section.

Uttering or Publishing False Document Listed in Section 248b

  1. Section 249b establishes that a person who knowingly utters and publishes as true a false, forged, altered, or counterfeit deed or other document listed in section 248b is guilty of a felony offense.
  2. The false document referred to in this section includes a deed, discharge of mortgage, power or letter of attorney, or any other document that affects an interest in real property and is falsely made, altered, forged, or counterfeited.
  3. The key element of this offense is the intent to injure or defraud another person by presenting the false document as genuine and true.
  4. The offense described in section 249b is classified as a felony, and upon conviction, the individual may face imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years.
  5. Section 249b includes an exception for scrivener's errors, which are unintentional mistakes made by a professional scribe or document preparer.
  6. In proceedings that result in a conviction under this section or for any lesser included offense, the circuit court is required to enter an order stating that the false, forged, altered, or counterfeit document is invalid.
  7. The court order also mandates the recording of a copy of the invalid document and a certified copy of the order in the office of the register of deeds of the county where the subject property or part of the property is located, as outlined in section 2935 of the revised judicature act of 1961.
  8. If the invalid document has already been recorded, the prosecutor must provide the court with the liber and page number or unique identifying reference number of the document, which should be included in the court order.
  9. The register of deeds is responsible for making reference to the liber and page number or unique identifying reference number of the invalid document in the index of the recorded documents. Any recording fees incurred in this process are to be paid as ordered by the court.

Historical Context

Section 249b was added to the Michigan Penal Code through Act 206 of 2011, which became effective on January 1, 2012. It is important to note that this analysis is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. For accurate and up-to-date information, it is advisable to consult legal professionals or refer to the complete and current version of the Michigan Penal Code.

This should be used for informational and general purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or relied on aside for general information that may contain opinion.


Contact Us About Your Case

From Our Clients


Randy Babi was absolutely phenomenal! One of the best attorneys out there. Doesn't tell you what you want to hear, but tells you the truth and keeps it real. On top of that, he gets the job done and gives you the best advice and will go full in on it. If your a review kind of person make sure you take this comment very seriously and give them a call immediately and don't waste any time.

- Twanzell W.

When this guy says he's a BOSS Attorney he really means it, he got a case dismissed for me when another reputable attorney told me I was getting two points no matter what. Randy went in the prosecuting attorneys office like a boss and came out with a dismissal, Thanks for living up to your name. This man is a LIVING LEGEND!

- Andre B.

Randy is great and easy to work with! He makes sure you feel valued and he is always on top of his game! Very appreciative of his hard work, professionalism, and knowledge! Thank you!

- Lamar B.

Mr. Babi just finished a case for my fiancé and we couldn't be more satisfied with the work he did! He fights for his clients, and puts in the work. Whenever my fiancé would be on the phone with him, I thought he was speaking to one of his friends. Very down to earth and gets the job done! I would highly recommend!

- Kelli C.

Randy Babi was my first and only call when looking for an Attorney. The reviews of his past cases is spot on 100%. His knowledge and experience is what makes him an amazing Attorney. He fought for me and I know he will fight for you! Please take my word and call these great people if you are in need, they will not let you down!

- Mike Z.

All I can say is attorney Carly the Boss represented me very well I always had contact with her. Her communication was excellent. I would recommend her Law Firm to anyone that has an issue the day I had court she spoke on my behalf she is very well spoken very professional and really has a passion for what she's doing so for me five stars 100% excellent service.

- Darryl R.

I am a family law attorney (and do not handles the same types of matters as Randy), but I know Randy well enough to make this recommendation. I endorse Attorney Randy Babi without hesitation. He knows the law, he cares for his clients, and is very trustworthy. God forbid I ever need his services, but he is one of the first people I would contact if I was in trouble.

- D. G.

5 years ago Great experience with Randy, the best attorney around, very kind and caring. He is the best at what he does and i highly recommend him to anyone. Very trustworthy and gets you the best possible outcomes. 5 stars all day long

- Calvin T.

Let's Work Together